Opinion
No. 106,543.
2013-04-19
STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Trudi Diane HAYNES, Appellant.
Appeal from Butler District Court; Michael E. Ward, Judge.
Submitted for summary disposition pursuant to K.S.A.2012 Supp. 21–6820(g) and (h).
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Trudi Diane Haynes filed a motion for summary disposition of her sentencing appeal pursuant to K.S.A.2012 Supp. 21–6820(g) and (h). The State responded, asking this court to dismiss Haynes' appeal. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find no error in the sentences imposed by the district court.
Haynes contends the district court abused its discretion in district court case No. 10CR278 by denying her request for a downward dispositional sentencing departure. The district court sentenced Haynes to a presumptive term of imprisonment for her possession of methamphetamine conviction. We are without jurisdiction to consider this issue. See K.S.A.2012 Supp. 21–6820(c)(1) (appellate court shall not review any sentence within the presumptive sentence for the crime); State v. Huerta, 291 Kan. 831, 837, 247 P.3d 1043 (2011) (reaffirming that K.S.A. 21–4721[c][1] eliminates appeals of presumptive sentences).
Dismissed pursuant to Rule 7.041A (2012 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 62).