From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hart

Review Division Of The Superior Court
Jun 17, 1971
279 A.2d 738 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971)

Opinion

The defendant's application for review of his sentence was received after the statutory thirty-day limit had expired, and therefore the Review Division was without jurisdiction in the matter.

Decided June 17, 1971

Application for review of sentence imposed by the Superior Court in Fairfield County (No. 19759). Application dismissed.

Herbert J. Bundock, public defender, for the defendant.

Walter D. Flanagan, assistant state's attorney, for the state.


The defendant was sentenced on January 20, 1971. His application for review of sentence was not filed with the clerk until February 22, 1971, more than thirty days after sentence. The Review Division has no jurisdiction to consider an application filed beyond the statutory limit of thirty days. General Statutes § 51-195; State v. Scates, 22 Conn. Sup. 270.


Summaries of

State v. Hart

Review Division Of The Superior Court
Jun 17, 1971
279 A.2d 738 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971)
Case details for

State v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. LESTER HART

Court:Review Division Of The Superior Court

Date published: Jun 17, 1971

Citations

279 A.2d 738 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1971)
279 A.2d 738

Citing Cases

State v. Stoll

"`A trial tests the court's ruling on a motion for disclosure, for it then appears whether the mover was…

State v. Gamble

The division has consistently held that it has no jurisdiction to consider an application filed beyond the…