From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
May 10, 2004
2004 Ohio 2302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

Case No. CA2003-09-237.

May 10, 2004.

Criminal Appeal from Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. CR2003-02-0193.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Randi E. Froug, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Fl., Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee.

Heather Felerski, P.O. Box 181342, Fairfield, Ohio 45018, for defendant-appellant.


DECISION


{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel, oral argument having been waived.

{¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Kelton Harris, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. Therefore, the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

Young, P.J., Powell and Walsh, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County
May 10, 2004
2004 Ohio 2302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

State v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelton Harris, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Twelfth District, Butler County

Date published: May 10, 2004

Citations

2004 Ohio 2302 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)