From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Mar 13, 2018
543 S.W.3d 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 106003

03-13-2018

STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Norvell HARRIS, Defendant / Respondent.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Susan Elizabeth Jostes, 100 S. Central Ave., Clayton, MO 63105. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: David L. Bryant, 2200 N. Hwy 67, #396, Florissant, MO 63032.


ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: Susan Elizabeth Jostes, 100 S. Central Ave., Clayton, MO 63105.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: David L. Bryant, 2200 N. Hwy 67, #396, Florissant, MO 63032.

Before Colleen Dolan, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa S. Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The State of Missouri filed this interlocutory appeal pursuant to Section 547.200 RSMo 2000 challenging the trial court’s Order granting Norvell Harris' motion to suppress evidence and statements. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Mar 13, 2018
543 S.W.3d 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. Norvell HARRIS, Defendant / Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Mar 13, 2018

Citations

543 S.W.3d 76 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)