From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake County
Nov 18, 2005
2005 Ohio 6158 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 2005-L-155.

November 18, 2005.

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 99 CR 000204.

Appeal Dismissed.

Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, 105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).

John Hanson, pro se, PID: A483-059, Belmont Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH, 43950-0540 (Defendant-Appellant).


MEMORANDUM OPINION


{¶ 1} On September 19, 2005, appellant, John Hanson, filed a notice of appeal from an August 15, 2005 judgment of the Lake County Court of Common Pleas. Thus, appellant's notice of appeal was filed thirty-five days after the judgment had been issued by the trial court.

{¶ 2} App.R. 4(A) states:

{¶ 3} "A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed or, in a civil case, service of the notice of judgment and its entry if service is not made on the party within the three day period in Rule 58(B) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure."

{¶ 4} App.R. 5(A) states, in relevant part:

{¶ 5} "(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases:

{¶ 6} "(a) Criminal proceedings;

{¶ 7} "(b) Delinquency proceedings; and

{¶ 8} "(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings.

{¶ 9} "(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right."

{¶ 10} In the present case, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor sought leave to appeal. Thus, this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. In order to appeal the trial court's decision, appellant must file a motion for delayed appeal in addition to a notice of appeal pursuant to App.R. 5(A).

{¶ 11} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed as being untimely.

{¶ 12} Appeal dismissed.

O'Neill, J., Rice, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hanson

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake County
Nov 18, 2005
2005 Ohio 6158 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

State v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Hanson, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eleventh District, Lake County

Date published: Nov 18, 2005

Citations

2005 Ohio 6158 (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)