From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hansard

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Apr 19, 2022
167 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 2022)

Opinion

No. 2021-0019

04-19-2022

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. HANSARD, Appellant.

Jason Holdren, Gallia County Prosecuting Attorney, Jeremy Fisher, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip D. Bogdanoff, Special Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, David S. Hansard. Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, urging dismissal of the appeal as having been improvidently accepted or, in the alternative, affirmance for amicus curiae Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney. Steven L. Taylor, Legal Research & Staff Counsel, urging dismissal of the appeal as having been improvidently accepted or, in the alternative, affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association. Flannery & Georgalis, L.L.C., and W. Benjamin Reese; and Bensing Law and Russell S. Bensing, Cleveland, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Olwyn Conway, Associate Clinical Professor of Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Deborah Jones Merritt, Professor of Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, amici curiae, urging reversal. Squire, Patton & Boggs, L.L.P., and Lauren S. Kuley, Cincinnati; and NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., and Samuel Spital, urging vacation of sentence and remand for a new suppression hearing for amicus curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.


Jason Holdren, Gallia County Prosecuting Attorney, Jeremy Fisher, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip D. Bogdanoff, Special Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, David S. Hansard.

Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, urging dismissal of the appeal as having been improvidently accepted or, in the alternative, affirmance for amicus curiae Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney.

Steven L. Taylor, Legal Research & Staff Counsel, urging dismissal of the appeal as having been improvidently accepted or, in the alternative, affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.

Flannery & Georgalis, L.L.C., and W. Benjamin Reese; and Bensing Law and Russell S. Bensing, Cleveland, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Olwyn Conway, Associate Clinical Professor of Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, and Deborah Jones Merritt, Professor of Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, amici curiae, urging reversal.

Squire, Patton & Boggs, L.L.P., and Lauren S. Kuley, Cincinnati; and NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., and Samuel Spital, urging vacation of sentence and remand for a new suppression hearing for amicus curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.

{¶ 1} This cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted.

O'Connor, C.J., and Kennedy, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Brunner, J., dissents.


Summaries of

State v. Hansard

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Apr 19, 2022
167 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 2022)
Case details for

State v. Hansard

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. HANSARD, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Apr 19, 2022

Citations

167 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 2022)
167 Ohio St. 3d 218