From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Haney

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 2004
103 P.3d 108 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

00CR0978MI; A116614.

Petition for reconsideration filed September 28, 2004. Opinion filed September 15, 2004.

December 8, 2004.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County. Robert Millikan, Judge.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. Casey, Assistant Attorney General, for petition.

Before Landau, Presiding Judge, and Brewer, Chief Judge and Armstrong, Judge.


ARMSTRONG, J.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


The state has petitioned for reconsideration, arguing that we erred in describing the manner in which the administrative search issue arose in this case. Although there is no transcript of the suppression hearing, we are now convinced that the issue was discussed at the suppression hearing and did not first arise in the court's letter opinion in which it explained its decision to deny defendant's suppression motion. We modify our previous opinion accordingly. However, our conclusion on this point does not affect the result in the case because we conclude that defendant adequately preserved the issues raised on appeal. We therefore adhere to our opinion as modified.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Haney

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 2004
103 P.3d 108 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

State v. Haney

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JON MICHAEL HANEY, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 8, 2004

Citations

103 P.3d 108 (Or. Ct. App. 2004)
103 P.3d 108