It is an established "principle that determining the civil or punitive nature of an Act must begin with reference to its text and legislative history." Seling v. Young, 531 U.S. 250, 262 (2001) (citing Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93 (1997)); accord In re W.M., 851 A.2d 431, 441 (D.C. 2004) (citing Seling); State v. Langdon, 472 P.3d 31, 36 (Haw. Ct. App. 2020) (quoting Citizens Against Reckless Dev. v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 159 P.3d 143, 152 (Haw. 2007)); State v. Meredith, 399 P.3d 859, 863 (Kan. 2017) (looking at text and legislative history); State v. Burr, 1999 ND 143, ¶ 13, 598 N.W.2d 147, 153 (same); State v. Hamann, 422 P.3d 193, 197 (Or. 2018); In re Commitment of Fisher, 164 S.W.3d 637, 646--47 (Tex. 2005) (citing Seling). We look at the text of the legislative enactment and its overall structure to ascertain whether "the legislature indicate[d] a preference either expressly or impliedly for a civil label or a criminal label."

Affirmed. State v. Hamann, 363 Or. 264, 422 P.3d 193 (2018).