From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 6, 2015
2015-UP-232 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-232

05-06-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Bruce Dewayne Hall, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-002390

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor James Strom Thurmond, Jr., of Aiken, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted April 1, 2015

Appeal From Aiken County D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor James Strom Thurmond, Jr., of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Price, 368 S.C. 494, 499, 629 S.E.2d 363, 366 (2006) ("Generally, appellate courts will not set aside convictions due to insubstantial errors not affecting the result. Thus, an insubstantial error not affecting the result of the trial is harmless where guilt has been conclusively proven by competent evidence such that no other rational conclusion can be reached. Where a review of the entire record establishes the error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, the conviction should not be reversed." (citations omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Hall

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
May 6, 2015
2015-UP-232 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 6, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Bruce Dewayne Hall, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

2015-UP-232 (S.C. Ct. App. May. 6, 2015)