From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. HAAS

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Wood County
Mar 9, 2001
Court of Appeals No. WD-00-048, Trial Court No. 76-CR-057 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2001)

Opinion

Court of Appeals No. WD-00-048, Trial Court No. 76-CR-057.

Decided: March 9, 2001.

Alan R. Mayberry, prosecuting attorney, and Jacqueline M. Kirian, for appellee.

William V. Stephenson, for appellant.


DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY


This case comes to us on appeal from the Wood County Court of Common Pleas, which found appellant to be a sexual predator pursuant to R.C. Chapter 2950. Pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 12, we sua sponte transfer this case to our accelerated calendar.

This court recently decided a case that is, procedurally, virtually identical to the instant case. See State v. Weatherford (Jan. 12, 2001), Wood App. No. WD-00-042, unreported. In Weatherford, this court held that the judgment resulting from the sexual predator hearing was barred by res judicata. The same reasoning applies here. Therefore, based on the authority of this court in State v. Weatherford (Jan. 12, 2001), Wood App. No. WD-00-042, unreported, we reverse and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to vacate its May 24, 2000 judgment entry. Appellee is ordered to pay the court costs of this appeal.

_____________________ PIETRYKOWSKI, P.J.
Melvin L. Resnick, J., Richard W. Knepper, J., Mark L. Pietrykowski, P.J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

STATE v. HAAS

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Wood County
Mar 9, 2001
Court of Appeals No. WD-00-048, Trial Court No. 76-CR-057 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2001)
Case details for

STATE v. HAAS

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Appellee v. Jeffery S. Haas, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Wood County

Date published: Mar 9, 2001

Citations

Court of Appeals No. WD-00-048, Trial Court No. 76-CR-057 (Ohio Ct. App. Mar. 9, 2001)