From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Haaf

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 15, 1973
208 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1973)

Opinion

No. 44098.

June 15, 1973.

Prohibition — writ made absolute — decision rendered without opinion.

Prohibition in this court upon the petition of James Haaf to restrain the Clay County District Court, James A. Preece, Judge, from trying said petitioner on a charge of bribery. Writ made absolute.

Thomson, Wylde, Nordby, Friedberg Rapoport and Jack S. Nordby, for petitioner.

Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, John Burns, County Attorney, Katz, Taube, Lange Frommelt, and Emanuel Z. Kopstein, for respondent.

Considered en banc.


The alternative writ of prohibition issued by this court in the above entitled matter on December 8, 1972, is herewith made absolute. Accordingly, the prosecution of James Haaf, arising out of an indictment dated January 5, 1972, charging him with committing the crime of bribery on November 9, 1970, in violation of Minn. St. 609.42, subd. 1(1), is permanently enjoined.

Because the court is divided on the reasons for reaching its conclusion, no opinion accompanies its decision.

Writ of prohibition made absolute.


Summaries of

State v. Haaf

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 15, 1973
208 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Haaf

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. JAMES HAAF

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 15, 1973

Citations

208 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 1973)
296 Minn. 532