From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Green

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Nov 29, 1982
452 A.2d 974 (Me. 1982)

Opinion

Argued November 4, 1982.

Decided November 29, 1982.

Appeal from the Penobscot County Superior Court.

David M. Cox, Dist. Atty., Gary F. Thorne, Asst. Dist. Atty., (orally), Bangor, for plaintiff.

Ferris, Dearborn Willey, Joseph L. Ferris (orally), Brewer, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and GODFREY, NICHOLS, ROBERTS, CARTER and VIOLETTE, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

Stephen Green appeals from his conviction on two counts of Burglary (Class C), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401, following a jury trial in Superior Court, Penobscot County. Green claims that the presiding justice's refusal to permit testimony attacking the reputation for truthfulness of a State's witness, on the grounds that the proferred evidence was too remote, was an abuse of discretion requiring a reversal of his convictions.

It is a basic rule that the balancing of the probative value of evidence against its unfairly prejudicial effect rests within the sound discretion of the presiding justice. M.R.Evid. 403; State v. Lagasse, 410 A.2d 537, 541 (Me. 1980). The record on appeal fails to convince us that the presiding justice's ruling constituted an abuse of discretion.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Green

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Nov 29, 1982
452 A.2d 974 (Me. 1982)
Case details for

State v. Green

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Stephen GREEN

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Nov 29, 1982

Citations

452 A.2d 974 (Me. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Sproul

Balancing the probative value of the evidence against its potential for unfair prejudice rests in the sound…