From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Green

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 26, 1987
511 So. 2d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-666.

August 26, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Sarasota County, John R. Blue, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.


The state appeals the sentence imposed on Gerald Green.

Green was convicted of possession and sale of cocaine. The recommended sentencing guidelines range was five and one-half years to seven years. The trial court departed downward and sentenced Green to four and one-half years. The trial court gave two reasons for departure: first, four years had elapsed between Green's prison release for prior convictions and commission of the instant offenses; and second, the offenses were not violent crimes involving a firearm.

On appeal the state argues that the reasons for departure are not clear and convincing. We agree and vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing.

The fact that Green did not engage in criminal activity during the four years between his release from prison and commission of the instant offense is not a valid reason for downward departure. See Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 1985); State v. Caride, 473 So.2d 1362 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Green argues that since a court may depart upward when the defendant persists in an escalating cause of criminal conduct, Keys v. State, 500 So.2d 134 (Fla. 1986), the court should be allowed to depart downward when the timing and pattern of his offenses show a decrease in criminal activity. However, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5)(b) indicates that if a person remains conviction free for ten years, not four, his prior record shall not be scored. The fact that these were nonviolent drug offenses committed without a gun is also not a clear and convincing reason upon which to base a downward departure. Hendrix; Caride.

Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines recommended range.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Green

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 26, 1987
511 So. 2d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

State v. Green

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. GERALD GREEN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 26, 1987

Citations

511 So. 2d 734 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

State v. McMullen

Under the established decisions construing the sentencing guidelines, it is eminently clear that the first…

State v. Chapman

See Rafferty v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D1864, D1866 (Fla. 2d DCA Aug. 1, 2001); State v. Bray, 738 So.2d…