From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gordon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 7, 1983
460 A.2d 1368 (Me. 1983)

Opinion

Argued May 11, 1983.

Decided June 7, 1983.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Kennebec County.

David W. Crook, Dist. Atty., Alan Kelley, Asst. Dist. Atty. (orally), Augusta, for plaintiff.

Burton G. Shiro Law Offices, Charles E. Trainor (orally), Waterville, for defendant.

Before McKUSICK, C.J., and GODFREY, NICHOLS, ROBERTS, VIOLETTE and WATHEN, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

The defendant, Eunice Gordon, appeals from a conviction for arson with intent to collect insurance proceeds ( 17-A M.R.S.A. § 802 (1)(B)(1) (1983)). Her principal contention on appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

It is well established that a criminal conviction will not be set aside unless no trier of fact could rationally find proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Henderson, 435 A.2d 1106, 1108 (Me. 1981). A conviction based on circumstantial evidence is not for that reason less conclusive. State v. McKenney, 459 A.2d 1093, 1096 (Me. 1983). Upon examination of the record, we find sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury.

The remaining issues are without merit and require no discussion.

The entry is:

Judgment of conviction affirmed.

All concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Gordon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Jun 7, 1983
460 A.2d 1368 (Me. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Gordon

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Eunice GORDON

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Jun 7, 1983

Citations

460 A.2d 1368 (Me. 1983)