From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Goldizen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Dec 16, 2003
121 S.W.3d 324 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

No. WD 62430

December 16, 2003

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, The Honorable Daniel Fred Kellogg, Judge.

Ellen H. Flottman, State Public Defender Office, Columbia, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, John Munson Morris and Dora A. Fichter, Office of Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Edwin H. Smith, Presiding Judge, Ronald R. Holliger, Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick, Judge.


ORDER

William Goldizen appeals his methamphetamine-possession conviction on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling objections to cross-examination concerning his past criminal offenses. Goldizen argues that cross-examination on this subject was more detailed than the law allows and had no other purpose than to show he was more likely to have committed the present offense.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties have, however, been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Goldizen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Dec 16, 2003
121 S.W.3d 324 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Goldizen

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. WILLIAM E. GOLDIZEN, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Dec 16, 2003

Citations

121 S.W.3d 324 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003)