From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. GLAD

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Mar 21, 1986
381 N.W.2d 101 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

declining to consider issue of defendant's "continuing obligation to pay court fees," including law-library fee, because issue was not raised in the district court

Summary of this case from State v. Edwards

Opinion

No. C5-85-2037.

February 11, 1986. Review Denied March 21, 1986.

Appeal from the District Court, Kittson County, Warren Saetre, J.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Janet Newberg Anderson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Dennis M. Sobolik, Kittson Co. Atty., Hallock, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Susan K. Maki, Asst. State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and WOZNIAK and SEDGWICK, JJ., with oral argument waived.


SUMMARY OPINION


FACTS

Appellant Richard Glad pleaded guilty in 1983 for the burglary of a cafe in Lancaster, Minnesota. The trial court sentenced appellant to 18 months, stayed execution, and placed appellant on probation for five years. Conditions of probation included payment of $630.78 restitution, $500 reimbursement to the public defender fund, $50 surcharge, and a $5 law library fee. On August 12, 1985, appellant was found in violation of probation for committing a new felony and failing to fulfill obligations to pay the restitution and the court costs. The court executed his sentence and indicated that his obligation to pay all costs remains in full force. On appeal, appellant challenges the continuing obligation to pay these costs.

DECISION

Appellant never raised the issue of his continuing obligation to pay court fees at the trial court level. Instead, at the revocation hearing, the trial court told appellant that "going to prison doesn't pay your financial obligations, you still owe it." We will not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. State v. Hanley, 363 N.W.2d 735, 740 (Minn. 1985). However, the State concedes that appellant's obligation to pay the restitution and reimburse the public defender fund terminated upon execution of sentence. In the interests of justice, we remand to the trial court to allow appellant an opportunity to raise his claims.

Remanded.


Summaries of

STATE v. GLAD

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Mar 21, 1986
381 N.W.2d 101 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986)

declining to consider issue of defendant's "continuing obligation to pay court fees," including law-library fee, because issue was not raised in the district court

Summary of this case from State v. Edwards
Case details for

STATE v. GLAD

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Richard GLAD, III, Appellant

Court:Minnesota Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 21, 1986

Citations

381 N.W.2d 101 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Edwards

Thus, he may be considered to have waived the issue. See State v. Glad, 381 N.W.2d 101, 101 (Minn. App. 1986)…

Abdirahman v. State

But he also asserts, for the first time on appeal, that he did not understand his rights, in part due to a…