From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ginter

Utah Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 2007
2007 UT App. 231 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 20070348-CA.

Filed June 28, 2007.

Appeal from Fourth District, Orem Department, 075200098 The Honorable John C. Backlund.

Thomas B. Ginter, South Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.

Before Judges Greenwood, Davis, and McHugh.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Defendant Thomas B. Ginter appeals his conviction and sentence for driving on a suspended license, a class C misdemeanor. See Utah Code Ann. § 53-3-227(1) (2006). Defendant argues that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to issue its sentence, judgment, and commitment. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

Defendant alleges in his docketing statement that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because: (1) it was not established by the United States or Utah constitutions; and (2) "there are no constitutionally qualified [judges] in the trial courts or in the appellate courts." These arguments are frivolous and without merit. See State v. Carter, 776 P.2d 886, 888 (Utah 1989) (stating that "this [c]ourt need not analyze and address in writing each and every argument, issue, or claim raised and properly before us on appeal").

Affirmed.

Pamela T. Greenwood, Associate Presiding Judge

James Z. Davis, Judge

Carolyn B. McHugh, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Ginter

Utah Court of Appeals
Jun 28, 2007
2007 UT App. 231 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Ginter

Case Details

Full title:State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Thomas B. Ginter, Defendant and…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 28, 2007

Citations

2007 UT App. 231 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)