From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 29, 1934
256 N.W. 828 (Minn. 1934)

Opinion

No. 30,026.

June 29, 1934.

Case followed.

Defendant was convicted in the district court for Ramsey county of the crime of attempted grand larceny in the first degree, and appealed from the judgment of conviction, Kenneth G. Brill, Judge. Affirmed, following State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255) N.W. 826.

John F. Dahl, for, appellant.

Harry H. Peterson, Attorney General, Roy C. Frank, Assistant Attorney General, M.F. Kinkead, County Attorney, and James F. Lynch, Assistant County Attorney, for the state.



This is a companion case to State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255 N.W. 826. The defendant here is the Ginsberg referred to in that opinion. The evidence in this case is substantially the same as in the Smith case except that Ginsberg did not testify and that he took a more active part in the offense than did Smith. The same questions are raised by this appeal that were raised by Smith. The same result must follow. The judgment appealed from is affirmed, and the sentence imposed by the trial court is directed to be executed.


Summaries of

State v. Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 29, 1934
256 N.W. 828 (Minn. 1934)
Case details for

State v. Ginsberg

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. ABE GINSBERG

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 29, 1934

Citations

256 N.W. 828 (Minn. 1934)
256 N.W. 828

Citing Cases

In re Disbarment of Ginsberg

He appealed from the judgment, which was affirmed here. State v. Ginsberg, 192 Minn. 241, 255 N.W. 828. In…