From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Gillespie

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 28, 2009
281 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED91180.

April 28, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Donald L. McCullin, Judge.

Timothy Forneris, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, John M. Reeves, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.



ORDER


Defendant, Shenandoah Gillespie, appeals from the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of robbery in the second degree. On appeal, defendant argues that the victim's identifications of him were the result of impermissibly suggestive police procedures and this rendered the victim's identifications unreliable.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Gillespie

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 28, 2009
281 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

State v. Gillespie

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Shenandoah GILLESPIE, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Apr 28, 2009

Citations

281 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)