To the contrary, all evidence reflects that the object of their conspiracy, namely, to evade capture, continued into Arizona, and thus there is no basis to conclude the conspiracy to commit drive-by shooting ended before Silva and Hill crossed into Arizona. See State v. Cruz, 137 Ariz. 541, 547 (1983) (explaining a "conspiracy may continue after the commission of the substantive offense" when the "object of the conspiracy includes more than the commission of a substantive offense"); see also State v. Gaydas, 159 Ariz. 277, 279 (App. 1988) ("A conspiracy generally ends once its criminal objective is attained."). Moreover, although no overt act was necessary to prove a conspiracy under A.R.S. § 13-1003(A), Silva's continued high-speed driving into Arizona and Hill's continued possession of a weapon qualified as acts in furtherance of the conspiracy sufficient to extend jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 13-108(A)(1).