Opinion
No. 20-KH-1303
03-16-2021
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. QUINCY JOSEPH GAUDET
IN RE: Quincy J. Gaudet - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court Number(s) 15-FELY-700751, 1st Circuit Court of Appeal, Number(s) 2020-KW-0382; Writ application denied. See per curiam.
WJC
JDH
SJC
JTG
JBM
PDG
Weimer, C. J., recused. Supreme Court of Louisiana
March 16, 2021 /s/_________
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE THIRTY-SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF TERREBONNE PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.