From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fulghum

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 24, 2004
128 S.W.3d 588 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. ED 82221

February 24, 2004

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Honorable Gary Gaertner, Jr.

Amy M. Bartholow, Columbia, Missouri, for appellant.

Andrea Spillars, Richard Starnes (co-counsel), Jefferson City, Missouri, for respondent.

Before Glenn A. Norton, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J.



ORDER


John Fulghum appeals the judgment entered on his conviction for stealing, third offense. He contends that the trial court plainly erred by admitting evidence associating him with an uncharged crime.

We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no error, plain or otherwise. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. The judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Fulghum

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Feb 24, 2004
128 S.W.3d 588 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

State v. Fulghum

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. JOHN FULGHUM, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Feb 24, 2004

Citations

128 S.W.3d 588 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004)