From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Frommelt

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 30, 1992
837 P.2d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

DCR91-12586; CA A72670

Submitted on record and briefs September 10, 1992

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing September 30, 1992

Appeal from District Court, Clackamas County.

Stephen L. Maurer, Judge.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and Alan H. Biedermann, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and De Muniz, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


The state concedes that the trial court erred when it ordered defendant to submit to breath tests at the request of a probation officer but failed to require that the officer first have reasonable grounds to believe that the test would disclose evidence of a probation violation. State v. Leen, 113 Or. App. 595, 832 P.2d 49 (1992); State v. Robertson, 113 Or. App. 467, 833 P.2d 326 (1992); State v. Hagger, 107 Or. App. 251, 810 P.2d 1356 (1991). We accept the concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Frommelt

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 30, 1992
837 P.2d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Frommelt

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DENNIS FRANK FROMMELT, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 30, 1992

Citations

837 P.2d 564 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
837 P.2d 564