State v. Frinks

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Dayton Carando Frinks, Jr., Appellant. Appellate…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

2015-UP-157 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 18, 2015)

Opinion

2015-UP-157

03-18-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Dayton Carando Frinks, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2013-001127

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Dayton Frinks, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted January 1, 2015

Appeal From Horry County Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia; and Dayton Frinks, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.^[1]

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C. J, and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ, concur