From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 8, 2021
No. 2021-UP-433 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-433 Appellate Case 2019-000892

12-08-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Heirberone Heava Foster, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Heirberone Heava Foster, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2021

Appeal From Lexington County William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, and Heirberone Heava Foster, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se briefs and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and MCDONALD, JJ, concur


Summaries of

State v. Foster

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Dec 8, 2021
No. 2021-UP-433 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Foster

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Heirberone Heava Foster, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-433 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 8, 2021)