From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Fortman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 25, 1998
701 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-899

Submitted October 13, 1998.

Decided November 25, 1998.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. CA 16565.

Mathias H. Heck, Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Cheryl A. Ross, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Rudd, Silverberg, Zaharieff Orlins Co., L.P.A., and Anthony J. Zaharieff, for appellant.


The judgment of the court of appeals on Proposition of Law No. I is affirmed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The appeal is dismissed as having been improvidently allowed on Proposition of Law No. II.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Fortman

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 25, 1998
701 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

State v. Fortman

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. FORTMAN, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 25, 1998

Citations

701 N.E.2d 690 (Ohio 1998)
701 N.E.2d 690