From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foret

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 10, 1963
245 La. 70 (La. 1963)

Summary

In State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606, this court denied an application for lack of perfected bills of exception.

Summary of this case from State v. Haik

Opinion

No. 46962.

October 10, 1963.

In re: Joseph Foret, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.


Writs denied. No perfected bill of exception in the record. See Art. 499, Code of Cr. Procedure, LSA-R.S. 15:499, and State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568. Moreover there appears no error patent on the fact of the record.


Summaries of

State v. Foret

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 10, 1963
245 La. 70 (La. 1963)

In State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606, this court denied an application for lack of perfected bills of exception.

Summary of this case from State v. Haik

In State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606, this court, analogizing from State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568, that perfected bills of exception are required in applications for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus in criminal cases, denied the application on the basis of this determination.

Summary of this case from State v. Normand
Case details for

State v. Foret

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. JOSEPH FORET, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 10, 1963

Citations

245 La. 70 (La. 1963)
156 So. 2d 606

Citing Cases

State v. Normand

Application refused. There are no perfected Bills of Exceptions in the record herein. See State v. Foret, 245…

State v. Wyche

There are no perfected bills of exceptions. See La. Code Crim.Proc. Art. 499, LSA-R.S. 15:499; State v.…