From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foreman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 26, 2010
364 N.C. 323 (N.C. 2010)

Opinion

No. 270PA10.

August 26, 2010.


ORDER

The state's petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

Rule of Appellate Procedure 21(c) mandates that petitions for writ of certiorari "shall be filed without unreasonable delay." See, e.g., State v. Rush, 158 N.C. App. 738, 741 (2003) (finding that "four-year delay in challenging a judgment constitutes `unreasonable delay'" under Rule 21(c)); Huebner v. Triangle Research Collaborative, 193 N.C. App. 420, 426 (2008) (holding that defendant's three-year delay in requesting certiorari review constituted "unreasonable delay" under Rule 21(c)). Defendant's thirteen-year delay in filing his petition for writ of certiorari in the Court of Appeals constituted unreasonable delay. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals' order allowing defendant's petition for writ of certiorari is reversed and defendant's appeal is dismissed.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 26th day of August, 2010.

Hudson, J. For the Court


Summaries of

State v. Foreman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 26, 2010
364 N.C. 323 (N.C. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Foreman

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DERRICK ROCHELL FOREMAN

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 26, 2010

Citations

364 N.C. 323 (N.C. 2010)