From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Foreman

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Mar 4, 2020
Cr. No. 1007011701 (R-4) (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 4, 2020)

Opinion

Cr. No. 1007011701 (R-4)

03-04-2020

Re: State of Delaware v. David Foreman


David Foreman
SBI# 00401151
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center
1181 Paddock Road
Smyrna, DE 19977 Dear Mr. Foreman:

On February 6, 2020, you filed your fourth motion for postconviction relief under Superior Court Rule Criminal Rule 61 with respect to the above-referenced matter.

Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(d)(2) provides:

"A second or subsequent motion under this rule shall be summarily dismissed, unless the movant was convicted after a trial and the motion either: (i) pleads with particularity that new evidence exists that creates a strong inference that the movant is actually innocent in fact of the acts underlying the charges of which he was convicted; or (ii) pleads with particularity a claim that a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the United States Supreme Court or the Delaware Supreme Court, applies to the movant's case and renders the conviction or death sentence invalid."

You have failed to meet these Rule 61 standards. Your motion for postconviction relief is procedurally barred. Therefore, your Rule 61 Motion must be DENIED as procedurally barred.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

/s/

Craig A. Karsnitz cc: Prothonotary's Office

Department of Justice


Summaries of

State v. Foreman

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Mar 4, 2020
Cr. No. 1007011701 (R-4) (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 4, 2020)
Case details for

State v. Foreman

Case Details

Full title:Re: State of Delaware v. David Foreman

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Mar 4, 2020

Citations

Cr. No. 1007011701 (R-4) (Del. Super. Ct. Mar. 4, 2020)

Citing Cases

Foreman v. May

The Superior Court denied that Rule 61 motion on March 4, 2020, and the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed that…