From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Folson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 1, 1997
942 S.W.2d 393 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

DOCKET NUMBER WD 52408.

February 25, 1997. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied April 1, 1997

APPEAL FROM BUCHANAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, HONORABLE BILL ROBERTS, JUDGE.

Dwight K. Scroggins, Jr., Prosecuting Attorney, Hershel D. Shepherd, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, St. Joseph, for appellant.

Timothy D. Ernst, Assistant Public Defender, St. Joseph, for respondent.

Before Hanna, P.J., Smart, J., and Laura Denvir Stith, J.


ORDER


The State appeals from an order granting defendant's motion for new trial, arguing that the trial court was required to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law specifying the ground on which it granted the motion, and that its failure to do so constituted reversible error. Defendant argues the State had no right to appeal grant of a new trial. We consider the merits of the appeal and affirm grant of a new trial. Motion to set aside denied as moot. Finding no precedential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25.


Summaries of

State v. Folson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 1, 1997
942 S.W.2d 393 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

State v. Folson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, APPELLANT, vs. ROBERT FOLSON, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Apr 1, 1997

Citations

942 S.W.2d 393 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)