State v. Flowers

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Laparis Shmel Flowers, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 1, 2020

Appellate Case No. 2018-000099 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 1, 2020)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2018-000099 Unpublished Opinion No. 2020-UP-207

07-01-2020

The State, Respondent, v. Laparis Shmel Flowers, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and Laparis Shmel Flowers, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Allendale County
Perry M. Buckner, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, and Laparis Shmel Flowers, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

LOCKEMY, C.J., and GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.