From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Feist

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jul 1, 2015
870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)

Opinion

No. 20150041.

07-01-2015

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Douglas Gary FEIST, Defendant and Appellant.

Britta Demello Rice, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Michael R. Hoffman, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Britta Demello Rice, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Michael R. Hoffman, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Douglas Gary Feist appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury conviction of criminal mischief and from a district court order granting the State's motion in limine to limit evidence of restitution. Feist argues the district court erred by granting the State's motion in limine. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion.

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DANIEL J. CROTHERS, LISA FAIR McEVERS, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Feist

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Jul 1, 2015
870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)
Case details for

State v. Feist

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Douglas Gary FEIST…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Jul 1, 2015

Citations

870 N.W.2d 26 (N.D. 2015)