From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Falls

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 25, 1992
823 S.W.2d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

Nos. 58843, 60145.

February 25, 1992.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; FLOYD McBRIDE AND JOHN CHANCELLOR, JUDGES.

Melinda Kay Pendergraph, Columbia, Emily Blood, St. Louis, for defendant/appellant.

William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Robin H. Grissom, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent/respondent.


ORDER


Defendant appeals his convictions for second degree robbery and first degree tampering and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Falls

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 25, 1992
823 S.W.2d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Falls

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. QUINCY FALLS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 25, 1992

Citations

823 S.W.2d 537 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992)