From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 28, 1993
861 S.W.2d 214 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

Nos. 61102, 63598.

September 28, 1993.

APPEAL FROM CITY OF ST. LOUIS; MICHAEL F. GODFREY AND DAVID C. MASON, JUDGES.

S. Paige Canfield, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Breck K. Burgess, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals his conviction for first degree assault and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.


Summaries of

State v. Evans

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Sep 28, 1993
861 S.W.2d 214 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. DONALD EVANS, APPELLANT. DONALD EVANS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Sep 28, 1993

Citations

861 S.W.2d 214 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)