Opinion
No. 95P20
12-15-2020
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlos ESPINOSA State of North Carolina v. Bardomiano Martinez
Stephen G. Driggers, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Espinosa, Carlos. Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, For Martinez, Bardomiano. Steven Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina. Scott K. Beaver, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina. Bardomiano Martinez, For Martinez, Bardomiano. Carlos Espinosa, For Espinosa, Carlos. N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.
Stephen G. Driggers, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Espinosa, Carlos.
Mark L. Hayes, Attorney at Law, For Martinez, Bardomiano.
Steven Armstrong, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.
Scott K. Beaver, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.
Bardomiano Martinez, For Martinez, Bardomiano.
Carlos Espinosa, For Espinosa, Carlos.
N. Lorrin Freeman, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th of March 2020 by Defendant (Carlos Espinosa) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2020."
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of March 2020 by Defendant (Carlos Espinosa) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:
"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2020."
The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th of March 2020 by Defendant (Carlos Espinosa) to Appoint Counsel:
"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2020."