Opinion
No. 35268
Decided October 16, 1957.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Cutting with intent to wound — Sufficiency of evidence — Section 2945.04, Revised Code — Defendant claimed unable to understand English — Failure to furnish interpreter — Section 1 Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Section 10, Article I, Constitution — Compulsory process.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.
Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Merle M. McCurdy, for appellee.
Mr. B. Bill Murad, for appellant.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL, TAFT and HERBERT, JJ., concur.
MATTHIAS, J., not participating.