From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Edge

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 18, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002579 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-002579 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-156

03-18-2015

The State, Respondent, v. Thomas Randall Edge, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Thomas Randall Edge, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Marlboro County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia; and Thomas Randall Edge, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.


Summaries of

State v. Edge

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 18, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002579 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 18, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Edge

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Thomas Randall Edge, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-002579 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 18, 2015)