From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Durham

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 10, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-196690 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-196690

10-10-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Melvin Durham, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Pickens County

Letitia H. Verdin, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-553


APPEAL DISMISSED


Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Durham

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 10, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-196690 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Durham

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Melvin Durham, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-196690 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2012)