From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Drumgoole

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Mar 10, 1989
538 So. 2d 1014 (La. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. K88-369.

April 7, 1988. Writ Denied March 10, 1989.

APPEAL FROM 7TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CATAHOULA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE W.C. FALKENHEINER, J.

Levi Drumgoole, Homer, pro se.

John Johnson, Dist. Atty., Harrisonburg, for State.

Before STOKER, DOUCET and YELVERTON, JJ.


WRIT DENIED: Relator's allegation that the prosecution made an improper reference, in his closing argument, to the fact that relator failed to testify in his own behalf is prematurely raised in his court since it was not urged by relator in his application to the district court. This court finds that the prosecution sufficiently proved by competent evidence the allegations charging relator as a habitual offender and that the trial judge did not err in finding the relator guilty of being a habitual offender. State v. Evans, 506 So.2d 1283 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1987).


Summaries of

State v. Drumgoole

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Mar 10, 1989
538 So. 2d 1014 (La. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Drumgoole

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LEVI DRUMGOOLE

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Mar 10, 1989

Citations

538 So. 2d 1014 (La. Ct. App. 1989)