From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dorko

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-UP-389 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-389 Appellate Case 2020-000239

11-03-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Mark Jeffrey Dorko, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2021

Appeal From York County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Joanna Katherine Delany, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.[

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Dorko

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Nov 3, 2021
No. 2021-UP-389 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Dorko

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Mark Jeffrey Dorko, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-UP-389 (S.C. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2021)