From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dodson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 26, 1992
111 Or. App. 643 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

C 90-04-32061; CA A67852

Argued and submitted January 31, 1992

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing February 26, 1992

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Stephen B. Walker, Judge.

Jesse Wm. Barton, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.

Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohmnayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Deits and Durham, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Defendant appeals his convictions for criminal conspiracy to commit aggravated murder, ORS 161.450, solicitation to commit aggravated murder, ORS 161.435, and attempted murder. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.115.

Defendant first argues that his demurrer should have been allowed, because the indictment does not adequately identify his co-conspirators. The indictment was sufficient.

The court imposed consecutive sentences on the convictions on the conspiracy and solicitation counts. The state concedes that the consecutive sentences are unlawful, because those convictions merge under ORS 161.485. We agree.

Defendant also argues that the court erred in purporting to impose conditions of confinement and post-prison supervision. The state agrees that the court can only recommend conditions. State v. Potter, 108 Or. App. 480, 816 P.2d 661 (1991). We accept that concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Dodson

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 26, 1992
111 Or. App. 643 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Dodson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. LINCOLN EDWARD DODSON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 26, 1992

Citations

111 Or. App. 643 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
825 P.2d 662

Citing Cases

State v. Weiss

The state concedes that the trial court lacked authority to impose post-prison supervision conditions. State…

State v. Weeks

The state concedes that trial court lacked authority to impose post-prison supervision conditions. State v.…