From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dixon

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 28, 1989
784 P.2d 134 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

89-00823-C; CA A60810

Argued and submitted November 29, 1989 conviction affirmed.

Remanded for resentencing December 28, 1989

Appeal from District Court, Jackson County.

Ross G. Davis, Judge.

Henry M. Silberblatt, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Acting Public Defender, Salem.

Ann Kelley, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in not specifying in the sentencing order the amount of restitution and court-appointed attorney fees that he is required to pay as a condition of suspending imposition of sentence.

The evidence was sufficient to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed.

The state concedes that defendant is correct in stating that the court erred in not specifying the amount of restitution and attorney fees that he is required to pay. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Dixon

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 28, 1989
784 P.2d 134 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Dixon

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. JOEL DANIEL DIXON, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 28, 1989

Citations

784 P.2d 134 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
784 P.2d 134