From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Din

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 4, 1990
789 P.2d 19 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

C88-1112CR; CA A60061

Argued and submitted January 24, 1990

Affirmed April 4, 1990

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County.

Alan C. Bonebrake, Judge.

Henry M. Silberblatt, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Acting Public Defender, Salem.

Keith W. Wingfield, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Sentence to pay victim's assistance fee vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Defendant appeals his conviction for theft in the first degree. The court imposed a $50 victim's assistance fee as part of the sentence. Because the conviction was treated as a misdemeanor for sentencing, pursuant to ORS 161.705, only a $20 victim's assistance fee is authorized. ORS 147.259 (1). The state concedes, and we agree, that the court erred in imposing the $50 assessment.

Defendant's other assignments do not warrant discussion.

Sentence to pay victim's assistance fee vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Din

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 4, 1990
789 P.2d 19 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Din

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. AZ DIN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 4, 1990

Citations

789 P.2d 19 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
789 P.2d 19