From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Detherage

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One
Jan 24, 1994
869 S.W.2d 293 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 18724.

January 24, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, GREENE COUNTY, J. MILES SWEENEY, J.

Raymond L. Legg, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Glancy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Following a bench trial on February 18, 1993, Richard Detherage (Defendant) was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), § 195.202, RSMo Supp. 1993. On April 1, 1993, the trial court sentenced Defendant to a two-year prison term, suspended imposition of that sentence, and placed Defendant on five years of supervised probation. Defendant appeals the conviction. This Court dismisses the appeal.

Defendant's single point relied on pertains to the trial court's refusal to suppress the LSD seized from Defendant and evidence of certain statements he made following his arrest. However, a defendant may not appeal from a conviction in which imposition of sentence was suspended, because a suspended imposition of sentence is not a final appealable judgment as required by § 547.070, RSMo 1986. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); State v. Hanners, 827 S.W.2d 273, 274 (Mo.App. 1992); State v. Sandbothe, 750 S.W.2d 664, 665-66 (Mo.App. 1988). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

PARRISH, C.J., and SHRUM, J., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Detherage

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One
Jan 24, 1994
869 S.W.2d 293 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Detherage

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD DETHERAGE, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One

Date published: Jan 24, 1994

Citations

869 S.W.2d 293 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

State v. Kimberley

The rule of Lynch has been followed on multiple occasions. See, e.g., State v. Burns, 994 S.W.2d 941, 943…