From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. DeGraffenreid

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One
Jun 9, 1993
855 S.W.2d 450 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 18335.

June 9, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, GREENE COUNTY, BOB J. KEETER, ASSOCIATE JUDGE.

Douglas A. Hosmer, Asst. Public Defender, Springfield, for appellant.

Thomas C. Mountjoy, Pros. Atty., Millie Donohoe, Asst. Pros. Atty., Greene County, Springfield, for respondent.


Appellant, William W. DeGraffenreid, was tried by the court without a jury August 11, 1992, on two counts of nonsupport, a class A misdemeanor. § 568.040, RSMo Cum.Supp. 1990. The next day, the trial court filed a memorandum finding Appellant guilty and setting forth the reasons.

According to the trial court's docket sheet, the next activity occurred August 14, 1992, when Appellant, his lawyer, and the prosecutor reappeared in the trial court. The court purported to sentence Appellant to thirty days in jail, suspend execution of the sentence, and place Appellant on probation.

The record on appeal contains no formal judgment.

Under Rule 29.11(b) and (e), Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure (1992), Appellant had the right to file a motion for new trial within fifteen days after the finding of guilty. The record is bare of any indication Appellant waived that right, yet the trial court purported to render judgment and sentence before the deadline passed.

Missouri cases have consistently held that in such circumstances the purported judgment and sentence are premature and void, hence there is no judgment from which to appeal. State v. Dieter, 840 S.W.2d 887 (Mo.App.S.D. 1992); State v. Goth, 792 S.W.2d 437 (Mo.App.W.D. 1990); State v. Wren, 609 S.W.2d 480 (Mo.App. W.D. 1980); State v. Collins, 580 S.W.2d 320 (Mo.App.S.D. 1979); State v. Summers, 477 S.W.2d 721 (Mo.App. 1972); State v. Nichols, 474 S.W.2d 54 (Mo.App. 1971).

In conformity with the procedure spelled out by this Court in Dieter, 840 S.W.2d 887, we dismiss the appeal and remand the case to the trial court with directions to grant Appellant either the opportunity to file a motion for new trial or waive his right to do so. If the right is waived expressly or by passage of time, or if a motion for new trial is filed and denied, the trial court may thereafter sentence Appellant. He will then have the right to appeal.


Summaries of

State v. DeGraffenreid

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One
Jun 9, 1993
855 S.W.2d 450 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. DeGraffenreid

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM W. DeGRAFFENREID, APPELLANT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 9, 1993

Citations

855 S.W.2d 450 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Dean

The record here is barren of any indication that Defendant waived his right to file a motion for new trial,…

State v. Wilson

Even so, the trial court entered judgment and sentenced Defendant before the expiration of fifteen days after…