From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Deboer

Utah Court of Appeals
Feb 15, 2007
2007 UT App. 49 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 20060780-CA.

Filed February 15, 2007. (Not For Official Publication).

Appeal from the Fifth District, Cedar City Department, 051500484, The Honorable A. Lynn Payne.

J. Bryan Jackson, Cedar City, for Appellant.

Mark L. Shurtleff and J. Frederic Voros Jr., Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges GREENWOOD, BILLINGS, and DAVIS.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


Jared Bennett Deboer appeals from his judgment, sentence, and commitment. Appellant's counsel filed a brief in accordance withAnders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief "objectively demonstrate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct. App. 1993) (per curiam). Counsel also certifies that he reviewed and briefed the grounds for appeal that Appellant requested be raised.See State v. Wells, 2000 UT App 304, ¶ 10, 13 P.3d 1056 (per curiam) (stating counsel must determine and brief any issues appellant seeks to raise prior to filing Anders brief with the court and disapproving simultaneous filing and service on appellant). Appellant has neither responded nor objected to the Anders brief filed by counsel.

Based upon our independent examination of the record, we determine that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction.

Pamela T. Greenwood, Associate Presiding Judge

Judith M. Billings, Judge

James Z. Davis, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Deboer

Utah Court of Appeals
Feb 15, 2007
2007 UT App. 49 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Deboer

Case Details

Full title:State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Jared Bennett Deboer, Defendant…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 15, 2007

Citations

2007 UT App. 49 (Utah Ct. App. 2007)