From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 22, 1984
483 A.2d 142 (N.J. 1984)

Summary

In State v. Davis (May 24, 1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47622, this court held that the loss of a permanent front tooth was sufficient to constitute serious physical harm.

Summary of this case from State v. Norman

Opinion

May 22, 1984.


Petition for certification denied.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 22, 1984
483 A.2d 142 (N.J. 1984)

In State v. Davis (May 24, 1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47622, this court held that the loss of a permanent front tooth was sufficient to constitute serious physical harm.

Summary of this case from State v. Norman

In State v. Davis (May 24, 1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47622, we found that even the loss of a victim's front tooth constituted "serious physical harm" as statutorily defined.

Summary of this case from State v. Whittsette

In State v. Davis (May 24, 1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47662, unreported, our court determined that a trial court should not sentence an indigent to pay a substantial fine which he has no ability to pay.

Summary of this case from State v. Mullins

In State v. Davis (May 24, 1984), Cuyahoga App. No. 47622, unreported, 1984 WL 5542, the Eighth District Court of Appeals held that where a court imposes a significant term of incarceration it abuses its discretion by imposing a $1,000 fine.

Summary of this case from State v. Smith
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. RONALD LEE DAVIS

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 22, 1984

Citations

483 A.2d 142 (N.J. 1984)
97 N.J. 605

Citing Cases

State v. Whittsette

{¶ 20} This Court, however, has also held other injuries or attempted injuries met the requisite test. In…

State v. Turvey

In the pre- Boston cases, the identifications were necessary to prove no other person committed the crime.…