From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 3, 2020
296 So. 3d 1041 (La. 2020)

Opinion

No. 2020-K-00392

06-03-2020

STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Ray DAVIS


Writ application granted. See per curiam.

PER CURIAM:

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE THIRD CIRCUIT, COURT OF APPEAL, PARISH OF GRANT

Writ granted. The matter is remanded to the court of appeal for further proceedings and to conduct a new error patent review in light of Ramos v. Louisiana , 590 U.S. ––––, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020). If the non-unanimous jury claim was not preserved for review in the trial court or was abandoned during any stage of the proceedings, the court of appeal should nonetheless consider the issue as part of its error patent review. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 920(2).

The present matter was pending on direct review when Ramos v. Louisiana was decided, and therefore the holding of Ramos applies. See Griffith v. Kentucky , 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708, 716, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987). Nothing herein should be construed as a determination as to whether that ruling will apply retroactively on state collateral review to those convictions and sentences that were final when Ramos was decided.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Jun 3, 2020
296 So. 3d 1041 (La. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CHARLES RAY DAVIS

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jun 3, 2020

Citations

296 So. 3d 1041 (La. 2020)

Citing Cases

State v. Sewell

In cases in which the trial court has been found to deny diminution sentence [sic], this court has corrected…

State v. Broussard

In cases in which the trial court has been found to deny diminution [of] sentence, this court has corrected…