From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 7, 2008
2008 Ohio 3879 (Ohio 2008)

Summary

In Davis, the defendant argued that his indictment was defective for failing to include the mens rea for his charged offense.

Summary of this case from State v. Jones

Opinion

No. 2007-2424.

Submitted April 23, 2008.

Decided August 7, 2008.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 88895, 2007-Ohio-5843.

Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Paul A. Kuzmins, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.


{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed as to the court of appeals' holding on appellant's fourth assignment of error below on the authority of State v. Colon, 118 Ohio St.3d 26, 2008-Ohio-1624, 885 N.E.2d 917, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with State v. Colon.

MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Davis

Supreme Court of Ohio
Aug 7, 2008
2008 Ohio 3879 (Ohio 2008)

In Davis, the defendant argued that his indictment was defective for failing to include the mens rea for his charged offense.

Summary of this case from State v. Jones
Case details for

State v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. DAVIS, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Aug 7, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 3879 (Ohio 2008)
119 Ohio St. 3d 113

Citing Cases

State v. Rogers

After the Supreme Court reconsidered Colon I, it reversed Davis in a one-paragraph opinion, stating only that…

State v. Lester

Additionally, as previously noted, the parties in Colon I did not contest the issue of whether R.C.…