From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Dash

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 9, 2019
2019-UP-017 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 9, 2019)

Opinion

2019-UP-017

01-09-2019

The State, Respondent, v. Gregory O. Dash, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-002017

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted November 1, 2018

Appeal From Orangeburg County Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Dash

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Jan 9, 2019
2019-UP-017 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 9, 2019)
Case details for

State v. Dash

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Gregory O. Dash, Appellant. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Jan 9, 2019

Citations

2019-UP-017 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 9, 2019)